Tag Archives: VMprocess

About Remote Code Execution - Microsoft SharePoint (CVE-2026-20963) vulnerability

About Remote Code Execution - Microsoft SharePoint (CVE-2026-20963) vulnerability

About Remote Code Execution - Microsoft SharePoint (CVE-2026-20963) vulnerability. This vulnerability was fixed in the January MSPT. At the time of the MSPT release on January 13, VM vendors did not highlight this vulnerability in their reviews, and Microsoft reported no evidence of exploitation in the wild. The CVSS vector was initially rated as CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (8.8). The "PR:L" indicates that authentication was required to exploit the vulnerability. However, on March 17, Microsoft updated both the vulnerability description and its CVSS vector. The updated CVSS vector is CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (9.8). The "PR:N" indicates that authentication is not required for exploitation.

Current vulnerability description:

"Deserialization of untrusted data (CWE-502) in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. In a network-based attack, an unauthenticated attacker could write arbitrary code to inject and execute code remotely on the SharePoint Server."

👾 On March 18, the vulnerability was added to the CISA KEV catalog. No detailed information about exploitation is available yet, and there are currently no public exploits. However, in terms of potential impact, this vulnerability may be comparable to last year's RCE "ToolShell" (CVE-2025-49704).

The situation surrounding this vulnerability demonstrates that the criticality of any vulnerability cannot be determined once and for all. Indicators of exploitation in the wild or public exploits may emerge at any time, and the vendor may also revise the vulnerability description and CVSS metrics for various reasons. Therefore, all vulnerabilities detected within an infrastructure must be continuously monitored (either internally or via a VM vendor), with their criticality regularly reassessed and remediation deadlines adjusted accordingly.

Given that the status of any specific vulnerability may change at any time, it is not advisable to dismiss vulnerabilities as definitively non-critical or non-exploitable. A responsible approach assumes that all detected vulnerabilities require remediation, prioritized according to their continuously updated risk levels.

March episode "In the Trend of VM" (#13): vulnerabilities of Microsoft, PAN-OS, СommuniGate and who should patch hosts with deployed application

March episode "In the Trend of VM" (#13): vulnerabilities of Microsoft, PAN-OS, СommuniGate and who should patch hosts with deployed application. I'm posting the translated video with a big delay, but it's better than never. 😉

📹 Video on YouTube and LinkedIn
🗞 Post on Habr (rus)
🗒 Digest on the PT website

Content:

🔻 00:00 Greetings
🔻 00:31 Elevation of Privilege - Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock (CVE-2025-21418)
🔻 01:12 Elevation of Privilege - Windows Storage (CVE-2025-21391)
🔻 01:53 Authentication Bypass - PAN-OS (CVE-2025-0108)
🔻 03:09 Remote Code Execution - CommuniGate Pro (BDU:2025-01331)
🔻 04:27 The VM riddle: who should patch hosts with a deployed application?
🔻 07:11 About the digest of trending vulnerabilities

На русском

New episode "In The Trend of VM" (#10): 8 trending vulnerabilities of November, zero budget VM and who should look for patches

New episode "In The Trend of VM" (#10): 8 trending vulnerabilities of November, zero budget VM and who should look for patches. The competition for the best question on the topic of VM continues. 😉🎁

📹 Video on YouTube, LinkedIn
🗞 Post on Habr (rus)
🗒 Digest on the PT website

Content:

🔻 00:29 Spoofing - Windows NTLM (CVE-2024-43451)
🔻 01:16 Elevation of Privilege - Windows Task Scheduler (CVE-2024-49039)
🔻 02:16 Spoofing - Microsoft Exchange (CVE-2024-49040)
🔻 03:03 Elevation of Privilege - needrestart (CVE-2024-48990)
🔻 04:11 Remote Code Execution - FortiManager "FortiJump" (CVE-2024-47575)
🔻 05:19 Authentication Bypass - PAN-OS (CVE-2024-0012)
🔻 06:32 Elevation of Privilege - PAN-OS (CVE-2024-9474)
🔻 07:42 Path Traversal - Zyxel firewall (CVE-2024-11667)
🔻 08:37 Is it possible to Manage Vulnerabilities with no budget?
🔻 09:53 Should a VM specialist specify a patch to install on the host in a Vulnerability Remediation task?
🔻 10:51 Full digest of trending vulnerabilities
🔻 11:18 Backstage

На русском

Is it possible to manage vulnerabilities without no budget?

Is it possible to manage vulnerabilities without no budget?

Is it possible to manage vulnerabilities without no budget? Well, basically yes. Most of the work in the Vulnerability Management process does not require purchasing any solutions. You won't need them to detect and describe assets. And also to discuss SLAs for vulnerability remediation (and preferably regular patching) with asset owners. And it's not that difficult to automate the creation of remediation tasks and tracking their statuses.

The main problem is vulnerability detection. It is difficult to imagine an organization's infrastructure for which the capabilities of free utilities will be enough. Unless only Linux hosts are used there and software is installed only from the official repository. Then OpenSCAP with OVAL content from your Linux vendor will be enough. 🙂

When using commercial VM solutions, there will also be "blind spots" - unsupported software or hardware installations. But if you use only free utilities, it will be one big "blind spot". 🙈

На русском

Should a VM specialist specify a patch to install on the host in a vulnerability remediation task?

Should a VM specialist specify a patch to install on the host in a vulnerability remediation task?

Should a VM specialist specify a patch to install on the host in a vulnerability remediation task? Here's what I think:

🔻 If there is a simple way to give such information to IT, then you need to do it. For example, if a vulnerability scanner gives such recommendations.

🔻 If it requires intensive research, then you shouldn't do it. Otherwise, it will be yet another game of "prove and show". And instead of building a VM process to improve the security of the entire organization, you will be investigating which vulnerability is fixed by which KB. Not cool. 😏

Detecting a vulnerability on a host is a sign that the IT department is not doing its job correctly. Ideally, everything should be fixed in the process of unconditional regular patching. And vulnerability scans should only confirm that everything is ok. 🟢👍 If IT can't implement such a process, then let them deal with fixing specific vulnerabilities and finding patches. 😉

На русском

New episode "In The Trend of VM" (#9): 4 trending vulnerabilities of October, scandal at The Linux Foundation, social "attack on the complainer", "Ford's method" for motivating IT specialists to fix vulnerabilities

New episode "In The Trend of VM" (#9): 4 trending vulnerabilities of October, scandal at The Linux Foundation, social "attack on the complainer", "Ford's method" for motivating IT specialists to fix vulnerabilities. The competition for the best question on the topic of VM continues. 😉🎁

📹 Video on YouTube, LinkedIn
🗞 Post on Habr (rus)
🗒 Digest on the PT website

Content:

🔻 00:37 Elevation of Privilege - Microsoft Streaming Service (CVE-2024-30090)
🔻 01:46 Elevation of Privilege - Windows Kernel-Mode Driver (CVE-2024-35250)
🔻 02:38 Spoofing - Windows MSHTML Platform (CVE-2024-43573)
🔻 03:43 Remote Code Execution - XWiki Platform (CVE-2024-31982)
🔻 04:44 The scandal with the removal of Russian maintainers at The Linux Foundation, its impact on security and possible consequences.
🔻 05:22 Social "Attack on the complainer"
🔻 06:35 "Ford's method" for motivating IT staff to fix vulnerabilities: will it work?
🔻 08:00 About the digest, habr and the question contest 🎁
🔻 08:29 Backstage

На русском

September episode of "In The Trend of VM": 7 CVEs, fake reCAPTCHA, lebanese pagers, VM and IT annual bonuses

September episode of "In The Trend of VM": 7 CVEs, fake reCAPTCHA, lebanese pagers, VM and IT annual bonuses. Starting this month, we decided to slightly expand the topics of the videos and increase their duration. I cover not only the trending vulnerabilities of September, but also social engineering cases, real-world vulnerability exploitation, and practices of vulnerability management process. At the end we announce a contest of questions about Vulnerability Management with gifts. 🎁

📹 Video "In The Trend of VM" on YouTube
🗞 A post on Habr (rus) a slightly expanded script of the video
🗒 A compact digest on the official PT website

Content:

🔻 00:51 Elevation of Privilege - Windows Installer (CVE-2024-38014) and details about this vulnerability
🔻 02:42 Security Feature Bypass - Windows Mark of the Web "LNK Stomping" (CVE-2024-38217)
🔻 03:50 Spoofing - Windows MSHTML Platform (CVE-2024-43461)
🔻 05:07 Remote Code Execution - VMware vCenter (CVE-2024-38812)
🔻 06:20 Remote Code Execution - Veeam Backup & Replication (CVE-2024-40711), while the video was being edited, data about exploitation in the wild appeared
🔻 08:33 Cross Site Scripting - Roundcube Webmail (CVE-2024-37383)
🔻 09:31 SQL Injection - The Events Calendar plugin for WordPress (CVE-2024-8275)
🔻 10:30 Human vulnerabilities: fake reCAPTCHA
🔻 11:45 Real world vulnerabilities: еxplosions of pagers and other electronic devices in Lebanon and the consequences for the whole world
🔻 14:42 Vulnerability management process practices: tie annual bonuses of IT specialists to meeting SLAs for eliminating vulnerabilities
🔻 16:03 Final and announcement of the contest
🔻 16:24 Backstage

На русском