Tag Archives: Qualys

Qualys released QScanner – a console vulnerability scanner for container images

Qualys released QScanner - a console vulnerability scanner for container images

Qualys released QScanner – a console vulnerability scanner for container images. Feed it an image and get a list of vulnerabilities (a la Trivy).

It supports:

“Local Runtimes: Scan images from Docker, Containerd, or Podman.
Local Archives: Analyze Docker images or OCI layouts from local files.
Remote Registries: Connect to AWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, JFrog, GHCR, and more.”

Capabilities:

🔹 Detects OS package vulnerabilities
🔹 Software Composition Analysis (SCA) for Ruby, Rust, PHP, Java, Go, Python, .NET and Node.js applications.
🔹 Detects secrets (passwords, API keys and tokens)

But it’s not free. 🤷‍♂️💸🙂 All cases, except SBOM generation, require ACCESS_TOKEN and Platform POD. QScanner is the interface of Qualys Container Security module.

It can be used for:

🔸 scanning local images on developers’ desktops
🔸 integration into CI/CD pipelines
🔸 integration with registries

The concept is interesting. 👍

На русском

Qualys announced the TotalAI module for artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLM) security

Qualys announced the TotalAI module for artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLM) security

Qualys announced the TotalAI module for artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLM) security. The module will be available in Q4 2024 as part of the Enterprise TruRisk platform.

Announced features:

🔹 Detection and monitoring of the AI ​​infrastructure of organizations. To avoid “shadow LLM”.

🔹 Vulnerability Management with a focus on AI threats. Especially on countering theft (extraction) of data and models. They will offer a variety of ways to fix vulnerabilities.

🔹 Specialized LLM scanning focussed on prompt injection, model theft, and disclosure of confidential information.

🔹 Compliance Management and risk management. They emphasize combating data leaks and mention GDPR, PCI, CCPA.

There is a screenshot of the interface with statistics on models and related threats. We can also see statistics on threats related to assets and interesting informers for AI Workloads, AI Software and GPU.

На русском

Regarding the Qualys Patch Management event that took place yesterday

Regarding the Qualys Patch Management event that took place yesterday

Regarding the Qualys Patch Management event that took place yesterday.

I liked:

✅ Cool report by Eran Livne about Patch Management capabilities in Qualys. 👍 Especially about creating linked patching tasks (first for a test scope, and a week later for a full scope) and about the ability to isolate hosts as a mitigation option (access remains only from the Qualys cloud). The part about new TruRisk Eliminate was also interesting.
✅ Adam Gray beautifully justified the need for mandatory patching (since prevention doesn’t really work 🤷‍♂️).

I didn’t like:

❌ Most speakers focused on other information security topics rather than patch management. I think it would have been possible to select more thematic reports for this event.
❌ I simply can’t accept theses like “you don’t need to patch all vulnerabilities”. 🤷‍♂️ My position: you need to patch everything. And workarounds are good for a while UNTIL a patch is installed.

На русском

Qualys introduces TruRisk Eliminate for augmented Patch Management

Qualys introduces TruRisk Eliminate for augmented Patch Management

Qualys introduces TruRisk Eliminate for augmented Patch Management. Qualys didn’t wait until the event and published a blog post. What they presented is an implementation of workarounds.

In the screenshot of TruRisk Eliminate we see a filtered list of vulnerabilities on assets, the criticality of vulnerabilities in the form of QDS, the Remediations and Mitigations columns.

🔹 Remediations – installing a patch or installing a patch with reconfiguration.

🔹 Mitigations – workarounds that neutralize the vulnerability instead of patching: changing the registry key, changing the config, removing the application, blocking the port, isolating the device, etc.

And there is a button to perform an action on the asset (using an agent) with a choice of Remediations/Mitigations option.

It’s a logical step. Since they gave the ability to patch, why not give the ability to apply workarounds. But Qualys will have a lot of difficulties with this. 🫣

На русском

Tomorrow Qualys will host a major online event about Patch Management

Tomorrow Qualys will host a major online event about Patch Management

Tomorrow Qualys will host a major online event about Patch Management. They promise to present the “groundbreaking new strategies” of “Patching goes Patchless”. Will they promote immutable infrastructure? Virtual patching? Something else? 🤔 We’ll see.

What else will there be, besides the keynote report by Qualys CEO?

🔹 CIS will talk about when to install patches (and when not to), minimizing disruptions to business.
🔹 Reports by CyberSec companies. InfoSys will tell you how to deal with 80-85% of critical security updates within 4-5 days. Novacoast will throw in a report “your tools don’t work”.
🔹 Client reports by JPMorgan Chase and Signature Aviation employees (judging by their social networks 😉).
🔹 2 product reports by Qualys about improving interaction with IT and “remediation beyond patching”.

The event will start at 9:00 AM PT and will last ~4 hours. I think the keynote and product reports are definitely worth checking out, the rest is optional.

На русском

I’ve released a new version of Vulristics 1.0.6

I've released a new version of Vulristics 1.0.6

I’ve released a new version of Vulristics 1.0.6.

🔹 I’ve made it easier to work with exploit data. Now all Data Sources bring such data in a single format and it is processed uniformly. Including signs of the presence of an exploit in Microsoft CVSS Temporal Vector (I classify them as private exploits). First, I look for the presence of public exploits; if there are none, then private exploits.

🔹 I fixed a bug due to which it was not possible to force the vulnerability type to be set from the Custom Data Source.

🔹 During simplified detection of product names for generated Microsoft vulnerability descriptions, product descriptions can now be pulled up by alternative_names as well.

🔹I fixed a bug with Vulristics crashing when generating a Microsoft Patch Tuesday report while searching for an MSPT review from Qualys. […]

Changelog
Uncompressed picture
На русском

OpenSSH “regreSSHion” RCE with root privileges (CVE-2024-6387)

OpenSSH regreSSHion RCE with root privileges (CVE-2024-6387)

OpenSSH “regreSSHion” RCE with root privileges (CVE-2024-6387). The vulnerability was discovered by Qualys. An unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary code as root. It sounds creepy. 😱🙂

This vulnerability is a regression of the CVE-2006-5051. For it, by the way, there are no signs of exploitation in the wild or exploits.

🔻 The regression happened in October 2020, starting with OpenSSH version 8.5p1
🔻 “glibc-based Linux systems” in default configuration are vulnerable, OpenBSD is not vulnerable
🔻 There are 14 million potentially vulnerable hosts on the Internet
🔻 Qualys promise not to publish the exploit, but third-party researchers can write it based on the detailed write-up

Vulnerable versions:

❌ OpenSSH < 4.4p1
❌ 8.5p1 <= OpenSSH < 9.8p1 Invulnerable versions: ✅ 4.4p1 <= OpenSSH < 8.5p1
✅ OpenSSH >= 9.8p1

Upd. Attacking a 32-bit system with ASLR in laboratory conditions took 6-8 hours. Apparently the process is not so easy. 😉

На русском