Tag Archives: Chromium

October Microsoft Patch Tuesday

October Microsoft Patch Tuesday

October Microsoft Patch Tuesday. A total of 213 vulnerabilities – twice as many as in September. Of these, 41 vulnerabilities were added between the September and October MSPT. There are four vulnerabilities with evidence of exploitation in the wild:

🔻 SFB – IGEL OS (CVE-2025-47827) – public exploit available
🔻 EoP – Windows Agere Modem Driver (CVE-2025-24990)
🔻 EoP – Windows Remote Access Connection Manager (CVE-2025-59230)
🔻 MemCor – Chromium (CVE-2025-10585)

Another vulnerability with a public PoC exploit:

🔸 RCE – Unity Runtime (CVE-2025-59489)

Among the remaining vulnerabilities with no public exploits or signs of exploitation in the wild, the following stand out:

🔹 RCE – WSUS (CVE-2025-59287), Microsoft Office (CVE-2025-59227, CVE-2025-59234)
🔹 EoP – Windows Agere Modem Driver (CVE-2025-24052), Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver (CVE-2025-55680)

🗒 Full Vulristics Report

На русском

September Linux Patch Wednesday

September Linux Patch Wednesday

September Linux Patch Wednesday. In September, Linux vendors began addressing 748 vulnerabilities, slightly fewer than in August. Of these, 552 are in the Linux Kernel. The share of Linux Kernel vulnerabilities is growing! One vulnerability shows signs of being actively exploited (CISA KEV):

🔻 MemCor – Chromium (CVE-2025-10585). Public exploits are available.

For 63 (❗️) vulnerabilities, public exploits are available or there are signs they exist. Notable ones include:

🔸 RCE – CivetWeb (CVE-2025-55763), ImageMagick (CVE-2025-55298), Asterisk (CVE-2025-49832), libbiosig (CVE-2025-46411 and 22 other CVEs), sail (CVE-2025-32468 and 7 other CVEs)
🔸 AuthBypass – OAuth2 Proxy (CVE-2025-54576), CUPS (CVE-2025-58060)
🔸 EoP – UDisks (CVE-2025-8067)
🔸 SQLi – Django (CVE-2025-57833)
🔸 SFB – CUPS (CVE-2025-58364)

🗒 Full Vulristics report

На русском

August Linux Patch Wednesday

August Linux Patch Wednesday

August Linux Patch Wednesday. I’m late with this LPW since I was improving the generation of LPW bulletin lists and the operation of Vulristics. 🙂 In August, Linux vendors addressed 867 vulnerabilities, nearly twice July’s total, including 455 in the Linux Kernel. One vulnerability is confirmed exploited in the wild (CISA KEV):

🔻 SFB – Chromium (CVE-2025-6558) – an exploited SFB in Chromium for the fourth month in a row. 🙄

Public exploits are available or suspected for 72 (❗️) vulnerabilities. The most important are:

🔸 RCE – WordPress (CVE-2024-31211) – from last year, but recently fixed in Debian; Kubernetes (CVE-2025-53547), NVIDIA Container Toolkit (CVE-2025-23266), Kafka (CVE-2025-27819)
🔸 Command Injection – Kubernetes (CVE-2024-7646)
🔸 Code Injection – PostgreSQL (CVE-2025-8714/8715), Kafka (CVE-2025-27817)
🔸 Arbitrary File Writing – 7-Zip (CVE-2025-55188)

🗒 Full Vulristics report

На русском

July Linux Patch Wednesday

July Linux Patch Wednesday

July Linux Patch Wednesday. This time, there are 470 vulnerabilities, slightly fewer than in June. Of these, 291 are in the Linux Kernel. One vulnerability shows signs of being exploited in the wild (CISA KEV):

🔻 SFB – Chromium (CVE-2025-6554)

There are also 36 (❗️) vulnerabilities for which public exploits are available or suspected to exist. Notable among them:

🔸 RCE – Redis (CVE-2025-32023), pgAdmin (CVE-2024-3116), Git (CVE-2025-48384)
🔸 EoP – Sudo (CVE-2025-32462, CVE-2025-32463)
🔸 PathTrav – Tar (CVE-2025-45582)
🔸 XSS – jQuery (CVE-2012-6708)
🔸 SFB – PHP (CVE-2025-1220)
🔸 DoS – LuaJIT (CVE-2024-25177), Linux Kernel (CVE-2025-38089)
🔸 MemCor – DjVuLibre (CVE-2025-53367)

🗒 Full Vulristics report

На русском

June Linux Patch Wednesday

June Linux Patch Wednesday

June Linux Patch Wednesday. This time, there are 598 vulnerabilities, almost half as many as in May. Of these, 355 are in the Linux Kernel. There are signs of exploitation in the wild for 3 vulnerabilities (CISA KEV).

🔻 SFB – Chromium (CVE-2025-2783)
🔻 MemCor – Chromium (CVE-2025-5419)
🔻 CodeInj – Hibernate Validator (CVE-2025-35036). This vulnerability is exploited in attacks on Ivanti EPMM (CVE-2025-4428).

Additionally, for 40 (❗️) vulnerabilities public exploits are available or there are signs of their existence. Notable among them are:

🔸 RCE – Roundcube (CVE-2025-49113)
🔸 EoP – libblockdev (CVE-2025-6019)
🔸 DoS – Apache Tomcat (CVE-2025-48988), Apache Commons FileUpload (CVE-2025-48976)
🔸 InfDisc – HotelDruid (CVE-2025-44203)
🔸 DoS – ModSecurity (CVE-2025-47947)

🗒 Full Vulristics report

На русском

Linux Patch Wednesday: here is this May peak!

Linux Patch Wednesday: here is this May peak!

Linux Patch Wednesday: here is this May peak! 🤦‍♂️ Also about June Linux Patch Wednesday. If you remember, in my post about the May Linux Patch Wednesday I was happy that, despite the launch of the rule for Unknown dates, the peak in May was insignificant. Although “32406 oval definitions without a date received a nominal date of 2024-05-15”. It turned out that the peak was not visible due to an error in the code. Ba-dum-tss! 🥸🤷‍♂️

I noticed that not all CVEs are in LPW bulletins, despite the addition of nominal dates, for example the high-profile vulnerability Elevation of Privilege (Local Privilege Escalation) – Linux Kernel (CVE-2024-1086). I could not find it anywhere. I debugged the function that distributes vulnerabilities into bulletins and added tests. I have ensured that all 38362 CVEs from the Linux OVAL content are actually distributed in bulletins. Including CVE-2024-1086. Here it is in February:

$ grep "CVE-2024-1086"  bulletins/*
bulletins/2024-02-21.json: "CVE-2024-1086": [
bulletins/2024-02-21.json: "title": "CVE-2024-1086 linux",
bulletins/2024-02-21.json: "title": "CVE-2024-1086 linux",
bulletins/2024-02-21.json: "title": "CVE-2024-1086 linux",

Well, there really is a peak in May. And how huge it is! 11476 CVEs! 😱 This is so much that I regenerated the Vulristics report for it only using 2 sources: Vulners and BDU. Since even from Vulners the data was not collected quickly enough. The report contains 77 vulnerabilities with signs of active exploitation in the wild and 1404 vulnerabilities with exploits, but without signs of active exploitation in the wild. Since for the most part these are old vulnerabilities for which it was simply not clear exactly when they were fixed, for example, Remote Code Execution – Apache HTTP Server (CVE-2021-42013), I will not analyze them in detail – for those interested, see the report. But please note that the report size is very large.

🗒 Vulristics report on the May Linux Patch Wednesday (31.3 MB)

As for the June Linux Patch Wednesday, which was finalized on June 19, there are 1040 vulnerabilities. Also quite a lot. Why is this so? On the one hand, the rule for Unknown dates added 977 Debian OVAL definitions without a date. Not 30k, like in May, but also significant. Out of 1040 vulnerabilities, 854 are Linux Kernel vulnerabilities. Moreover, there are quite a lot of “old” vulnerability identifiers, but created in 2024. For example, CVE-2021-47489 with NVD Published Date 05/22/2024. 🤔 CNA Linux Kernel is doing something strange.

🔻 With signs of exploitation in the wild again Remote Code Execution – Chromium (CVE-2024-5274, CVE-2024-4947), like in Microsoft Patch Tuesday. According to the BDU, Remote Code Execution – Libarchive (CVE-2024-26256) is also exploited in the wild.

🔸 Another 20 vulnerabilities with a public exploit. I can highlight separately Remote Code Execution – Cacti (CVE-2024-25641) and Remote Code Execution – onnx/onnx framework (CVE-2024-5187).

🗒 Vulristics report on the June Linux Patch Wednesday (4.4 MB)

June Microsoft Patch Tuesday

June Microsoft Patch Tuesday

June Microsoft Patch Tuesday. There are 69 vulnerabilities in total, 18 of which were added between May and June Patch Tuesday. Among these added were 2 vulnerabilities with signs of exploitation in the wild:

🔻 Remote Code Execution – Chromium (CVE-2024-5274, CVE-2024-4947). Both vulnerabilities are in CISA KEV; there are no exploits for them yet.

For the remaining vulnerabilities, there are no formal signs of exploitation in the wild or public exploits yet.

The specialized InfoSec media pay attention to these 2:

🔸 Remote Code Execution – Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) (CVE-2024-30080). This vulnerability has a high CVSS Score of 9.8. To get RCE, the attacker sends a specially crafted malicious packet to the MSMQ server. The vulnerability may well become wormable for Windows servers with MSMQ enabled. It is very similar to last year’s QueueJumper (CVE-2023-21554).
🔸 Denial of Service – DNSSEC (CVE-2023-50868). Vulnerability in DNSSEC validation. An attacker can cause DoS using standard DNS integrity protocols. 🤷‍♂️ I don’t see any super criticality, but this is rare for MS Patch Tuesday, which is probably why everyone is writing about it.

What else you can pay attention to:

🔸 Elevation of Privilege – Windows Win32k (CVE-2024-30091), Windows Kernel (CVE-2024-30088, CVE-2024-30099) and Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver (CVE-2024-30085). Why these? Microsoft’s CVSS states that there are private Proof-of-Concept exploits for them.
🔸 Remote Code Execution – Microsoft Office (CVE-2024-30101). This is a Microsoft Outlook vulnerability. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, a user must open a malicious email in an affected version of Microsoft Outlook and then perform certain actions to trigger the vulnerability. It’s enough to open the email in the Preview Pane. However, to successfully exploit this vulnerability, an attacker needs to win the race condition.
🔸 Remote Code Execution – Microsoft Outlook (CVE-2024-30103). Preview Pane is a vector. Authentication required. The vulnerability is somehow related to the creation of malicious DLL files. 🤷‍♂️
🔸 Remote Code Execution – Windows Wi-Fi Driver (CVE-2024-30078). An attacker can execute code on a vulnerable system by sending a specially crafted network packet. The victim must be within the attacker’s Wi-Fi range and use a Wi-Fi adapter. Sounds interesting, let’s wait for details. 😈
🔸 Remote Code Execution – Microsoft Office (CVE-2024-30104). An attacker must send the user a malicious file and convince the user to open the file. The Preview Pane is NOT an attack vector.

🗒 Vulristics report on June Microsoft Patch Tuesday

На русском